

The writer’s work on the implicit hypotext fictionalizes the biographical facts, to which he adds imaginary episodes. The story initially presents itself as a conventional biographical narrative (covering the illness and death of Chekhov), but it is soon transformed by excisions, extensions, and expansions. The usual characters and themes are not to be found, nor are the settings, nor even is the so-called minimalist narrative mode or style. This (.)ġ “Errand” is an altogether surprising short story among the works of Raymond Carver.

And when a character becomes the narrator of an imaginary second narrative that reshuffles the items of the first narrative, readers no longer know whether the created scene in the present tense has come to “real” life or whether they are being deceived by the staging of a fake reality. Excisions, extensions, and the addition of more and more detailed imaginary episodes make it difficult to discriminate between the reality of Chekhov's life and the fiction in the story.

Everything in Carver’s last story revolves around the notion of realism.From the objective biographical data of the implicit hypotext to the subjectively determined fictive hypertext, the shift is sometimes puzzling. “Errand” has much more to do with Chekhov as a writer than with his last days and death.
